Shipbucket
http://67.205.157.234/forums/

burke flight 3: 1989 concept
http://67.205.157.234/forums/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=1368		 Page 1 of 3
Author:  acelanceloet [ June 15th, 2011, 9:02 pm ]
Post subject:  burke flight 3: 1989 concept
[ img ]
[ img ]
[ img ]
[ img ]
Author:  TimothyC [ June 15th, 2011, 9:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: burke flight 3: 1989 concept
TT hatch looks a bit big, but that's an artistic decision.

That said, it's a fine drawing.
Author:  Mitchell van Os [ June 15th, 2011, 9:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: burke flight 3: 1989 concept
I cant believe the RAS tower is behind the helipad.
How do you think the Pilots can perform a side kick landing?
That isnt possible, especially on high seas. It is to risky to land between the housing and that RAS tower.
One movement and youre a dead man.
Author:  acelanceloet [ June 15th, 2011, 9:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: burke flight 3: 1989 concept
first of all: look at the plans, it is possible. and second: that mast is foldable ;) so that is what makes it possible.
Author:  Thiel [ June 15th, 2011, 9:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: burke flight 3: 1989 concept
And besides, heloes does side kick landings, as you call them, all the time. In fact it's SOP in many navies.
Author:  erik_t [ June 16th, 2011, 2:28 am ]
Post subject:  Re: burke flight 3: 1989 concept
I hope you checked my SQQ-89 drawing and skegs against the source material, as (IIRC) they weren't intended to be exactly the same as Burke III.
TimothyC wrote:
TT hatch looks a bit big, but that's an artistic decision.
No it's not, it's outrageously oversized.
Author:  Mitchell van Os [ June 16th, 2011, 9:53 am ]
Post subject:  Re: burke flight 3: 1989 concept
Thiel wrote:
And besides, heloes does side kick landings, as you call them, all the time. In fact it's SOP in many navies.
Read my post Thiel.
You cant do that with that mast up.
One movement of the ship and the helo crashes.
But since it can be folded... It can.
Author:  acelanceloet [ June 16th, 2011, 10:00 am ]
Post subject:  Re: burke flight 3: 1989 concept
erik_t wrote:
I hope you checked my SQQ-89 drawing and skegs against the source material, as (IIRC) they weren't intended to be exactly the same as Burke III.
TimothyC wrote:
TT hatch looks a bit big, but that's an artistic decision.
No it's not, it's outrageously oversized.
the sonar fitted perfectly, so I guessed (IIRC, tim thought the same) that it would fit. the skeg is redrawn, only the same style as yours ;) and I will do something about that torpedo hatch...... any other comments?
Author:  Colombamike [ June 16th, 2011, 11:13 am ]
Post subject:  Re: burke flight 3: 1989 concept
acelanceloet wrote:
any other comments?
Yeah
In the official "side line" drawing I see only one central shaft
In the "overview" official drawing of Burke III I see 2 shafts... :?
Author:  acelanceloet [ June 16th, 2011, 11:26 am ]
Post subject:  Re: burke flight 3: 1989 concept
the overview shows an slightly different (shorter and other underwaterhull) design. that design is coming soon as well, when I have taken all mistakes out of this one.

btw, there are 2 shafts, only with this hull design there is an 'skeg'.
Page 1 of 3 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
https://www.phpbb.com/