Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 1 of 3  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 3 »
Author Message
acelanceloet
Post subject: burke flight 3: 1989 conceptPosted: June 15th, 2011, 9:02 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
[ img ]
[ img ]
[ img ]
[ img ]

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: burke flight 3: 1989 conceptPosted: June 15th, 2011, 9:13 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
TT hatch looks a bit big, but that's an artistic decision.

That said, it's a fine drawing.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Mitchell van Os
Post subject: Re: burke flight 3: 1989 conceptPosted: June 15th, 2011, 9:20 pm
Offline
Posts: 1056
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:19 pm
I cant believe the RAS tower is behind the helipad.
How do you think the Pilots can perform a side kick landing?
That isnt possible, especially on high seas. It is to risky to land between the housing and that RAS tower.
One movement and youre a dead man.

_________________
Fryssian AU with Lt.Maverick 114
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=9802&p=193331#p193331
[ img ]
Embarked on: HNLMS Karel Doorman A833
To do list:
-Zeven Provincien class cruiser
-Joint support ship all sides
-F124 Sachsen class frigate
-F125 Baden-Württemberg class frigate
-Clemencau class aircraft carrier
-Zeven provincien class frigate
-Poolster class AOR
-Amsterdam class AOR
-Minas Gerais aircraft carrier


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: burke flight 3: 1989 conceptPosted: June 15th, 2011, 9:22 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
first of all: look at the plans, it is possible. and second: that mast is foldable ;) so that is what makes it possible.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: burke flight 3: 1989 conceptPosted: June 15th, 2011, 9:40 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
And besides, heloes does side kick landings, as you call them, all the time. In fact it's SOP in many navies.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: burke flight 3: 1989 conceptPosted: June 16th, 2011, 2:28 am
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
I hope you checked my SQQ-89 drawing and skegs against the source material, as (IIRC) they weren't intended to be exactly the same as Burke III.
TimothyC wrote:
TT hatch looks a bit big, but that's an artistic decision.
No it's not, it's outrageously oversized.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Mitchell van Os
Post subject: Re: burke flight 3: 1989 conceptPosted: June 16th, 2011, 9:53 am
Offline
Posts: 1056
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:19 pm
Thiel wrote:
And besides, heloes does side kick landings, as you call them, all the time. In fact it's SOP in many navies.
Read my post Thiel.
You cant do that with that mast up.
One movement of the ship and the helo crashes.
But since it can be folded... It can.

_________________
Fryssian AU with Lt.Maverick 114
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=9802&p=193331#p193331
[ img ]
Embarked on: HNLMS Karel Doorman A833
To do list:
-Zeven Provincien class cruiser
-Joint support ship all sides
-F124 Sachsen class frigate
-F125 Baden-Württemberg class frigate
-Clemencau class aircraft carrier
-Zeven provincien class frigate
-Poolster class AOR
-Amsterdam class AOR
-Minas Gerais aircraft carrier


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: burke flight 3: 1989 conceptPosted: June 16th, 2011, 10:00 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
erik_t wrote:
I hope you checked my SQQ-89 drawing and skegs against the source material, as (IIRC) they weren't intended to be exactly the same as Burke III.
TimothyC wrote:
TT hatch looks a bit big, but that's an artistic decision.
No it's not, it's outrageously oversized.
the sonar fitted perfectly, so I guessed (IIRC, tim thought the same) that it would fit. the skeg is redrawn, only the same style as yours ;) and I will do something about that torpedo hatch...... any other comments?

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Colombamike
Post subject: Re: burke flight 3: 1989 conceptPosted: June 16th, 2011, 11:13 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1359
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 6:18 am
Location: France, Marseille
acelanceloet wrote:
any other comments?
Yeah
In the official "side line" drawing I see only one central shaft
In the "overview" official drawing of Burke III I see 2 shafts... :?


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: burke flight 3: 1989 conceptPosted: June 16th, 2011, 11:26 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
the overview shows an slightly different (shorter and other underwaterhull) design. that design is coming soon as well, when I have taken all mistakes out of this one.

btw, there are 2 shafts, only with this hull design there is an 'skeg'.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 1 of 3  [ 26 posts ]  Return to “Never-Built Designs” | Go to page 1 2 3 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]