Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 6 of 8  [ 74 posts ]  Go to page « 14 5 6 7 8 »
Author Message
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: CSGN mk2Posted: April 22nd, 2011, 12:37 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
I'd use "United States" instead of "USA", but that is just me.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: CSGN mk2Posted: April 22nd, 2011, 7:50 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
yeah, your right about that. I think it is more worthwile to name it 'united states, csgn mk2' instead of 'USA, cruiser strike guided missiles nuclear mk2' :P I'll do that.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: CSGN mk2Posted: April 22nd, 2011, 1:30 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
[ img ]
fixed

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Kamikazi
Post subject: Re: CSGN mk2Posted: April 22nd, 2011, 2:59 pm
Offline
Posts: 18
Joined: November 16th, 2010, 8:22 pm
The spacing between the Harpoons does not match up between the side and top views.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: CSGN mk2Posted: April 22nd, 2011, 3:01 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
actually, it does. they are exactly the same. there is only one difference: I have left out one of the diagonal canisters on the sideview, because it gave an really cluttered view over there.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: CSGN mk2Posted: May 26th, 2012, 7:23 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
[ img ]
updated. half the parts that were on have had an update, so it needed it...
if there are no flaws found out in 24 hours from now, I will put her in the upload session :P

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: CSGN mk2Posted: May 26th, 2012, 11:13 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
The top view looks grossly underdetailed, especially to your own standards.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: CSGN mk2Posted: May 27th, 2012, 8:00 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
that is mainly because it was made to show the basic arrangement, not to be an complete top view like Erik sometimes makes :P
that is not that much of an problem, is it?

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Hood
Post subject: Re: CSGN mk2Posted: May 27th, 2012, 9:02 am
Offline
Posts: 7233
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am
Looks good, I remember doing an AU version of this design some time ago kitbashed from Tico and Spruance parts. It's a odd ship to classify, it lacks the long-range punch of a Kirov but on the other hand lacks the aircraft capability of an Invincible. It's a kind of half-way house between the two. Very interesting, certainly such a ship is more useful now than it would have been during a Cold War WWIII-type scenario.

_________________
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: CSGN mk2Posted: May 27th, 2012, 3:43 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
Well, you're thinking about it from the wrong point of view. It's not intended as the centerpiece of a ASW escort flotilla, like an Invincible, and it's not intended as some sort of command-center-god-king of ship-hunting surface combatants like a Kirov. It's really a ship driven entirely by the introduction of the Tomahawk, and a return of a strategic role that had disappeared with the end of Regulus. AEGIS allows such a ship to operate fully independently in the face of quite significant air forces, and the multitude of hangars on this particular type would most likely be full of ASW helos, making it less vulnerable to a cheap kill by some pokey SSK. Ultimately it's all to leverage the period maritime strategy of applying USN resources to somewhat asymmetric vulnerabilities of the Soviet Union. In this case, it spreads the nuclear wealth over a much wider range of sea. When you consider it as a relatively (!!) inexpensive nuclear delivery platform that could only be decisively countered by a couple of Backfire regiments, whose weapons are a completely different intercept target than a ballistic missile, it makes quite considerable sense.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 6 of 8  [ 74 posts ]  Return to “Never-Built Designs” | Go to page « 14 5 6 7 8 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]