» »

Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 3 of 5  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5 »
[Print view]
Author Message
erik_t
Post subject: Re: USN WWII CV (BB61-66)Posted: January 27th, 2012, 2:46 am
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
CanisD wrote:
My take on the design. I figure there would be another opening forward along with the one aft.
There almost certainly would be - US carrier doctrine mandated an essentially open-air hangar.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: USN WWII CV (BB61-66)Posted: January 27th, 2012, 4:55 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
And I think operational wisdom - especially with the Japanese and the few fully enclosed-hangar carriers they produced - bore out the wisdom of USN operational doctrine.

Of course what's practical now has changed quite drastically and no longer resembles what's practical back then.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
emperor_andreas
Post subject: Re: USN WWII CV (BB61-66)Posted: January 27th, 2012, 8:37 am
Offline
Posts: 3894
Joined: November 17th, 2010, 8:03 am
Location: Corinth, MS USA
Contact: YouTube
Very nicely done!

-Matt

_________________
[ img ]
MS State Guard - 08 March 2014 - 28 January 2023

The Official IJN Ships & Planes List

#FJB
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: USN WWII CV (BB61-66)Posted: January 27th, 2012, 8:52 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
SrGopher wrote:
Whats that AA gun to the right of your 5"/38s (The top view of which I might add, looks great).
Quad Bofors

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
erik_t
Post subject: Re: USN WWII CV (BB61-66)Posted: January 27th, 2012, 5:20 pm
Offline
Posts: 2936
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 11:38 pm
Location: Midwest US
klagldsf wrote:
And I think operational wisdom - especially with the Japanese and the few fully enclosed-hangar carriers they produced - bore out the wisdom of USN operational doctrine.

Of course what's practical now has changed quite drastically and no longer resembles what's practical back then.
Well, the flight deck is the strength deck now, so one simply cannot have an open hangar. Of course, large elevator cutouts provide substantial ventilation as required.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Hood
Post subject: Re: USN WWII CV (BB61-66)Posted: January 28th, 2012, 12:03 pm
Offline
Posts: 7229
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am
Nice progress. This conversion has always interested me, perhaps not the most likely of plans to be implemented in real-life but certaintly it gives a different perspective from a fleet stuffed with Essexes.
Keep up the good work Jabba and kudos for attempting a top view and a portside view too!

_________________
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Bombhead
Post subject: Re: USN WWII CV (BB61-66)Posted: January 29th, 2012, 1:48 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2299
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 7:41 pm
ALVAMA wrote:
acelanceloet wrote:
for carriers they were around long before I joined.... so I doubt that was only mitch, Alex....
'

Not my point man..... Not my point man....... If there are perhaps 3 topviews in earlier date, Mitch started the Hype, he made 20 kinds to show how it sould be done. A proper stadium started, He desingned textures and topview stuff as no body else did. ;)
Alex is absolutely right.It was indeed Mitch's idea to start with.Alex's Karel Dooman and Crazyhorse's Invincible were my inspirations to do carriers in this style and if you like them do them.Carry on Jabba you are doing a great job. ;)
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: USN WWII CV (BB61-66)Posted: January 29th, 2012, 5:51 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
Top views are certainly nice and welcome, but not strictly mandatory.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Portsmouth Bill
Post subject: Re: USN WWII CV (BB61-66)Posted: January 29th, 2012, 6:03 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3220
Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom
Quote:
Top views are certainly nice and welcome, but not strictly mandatory.
Quote:
Top views are nice, if folk like to draw them, but like a lot of 'add ons' they are not why Shipbucket exists: the standard side view is the reason.
I give up :roll:
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
klagldsf
Post subject: Re: USN WWII CV (BB61-66)Posted: January 29th, 2012, 6:18 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2765
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 4:14 pm
People seem to be confused on a lot of issues (a lot of people here have English as a second language) so sometimes it's helpful to repeat some things in a friendly manner.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 3 of 5  [ 41 posts ]  Return to “Never-Built Designs” | Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests

The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]