Shipbucket

Official Forum

Advanced search

Quick links

FAQ

Unanswered topics | Active topics

Board index » Shipbucket Projects (2 pixels : 1 foot) » Never-Built Designs

M-frigate development

Moderator: Community Manager
Print view	Page 3 of 4 [ 31 posts ]	Go to page « 1 2 3 4 »
[Print view]

Author

Message

acelanceloet

Post subject: Re: M-frigate development

Posted: May 17th, 2011, 8:06 pm

Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

IMO, that would look real bad.... I could remove the 'outher' ones maybe, but I think it is better as it is.... any comments on the ship?

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin

Top

Mitchell van Os

Post subject: Re: M-frigate development

Posted: May 17th, 2011, 8:33 pm

Posts: 1056
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:19 pm

Thiel wrote:

Brackets within brackets are not a winning solution.

Mooring rings? Or?

_________________
Fryssian AU with Lt.Maverick 114
viewtopic.php?f=14&t=9802&p=193331#p193331
[ img ]

Embarked on: HNLMS Karel Doorman A833
To do list:
-Zeven Provincien class cruiser
-Joint support ship all sides
-F124 Sachsen class frigate
-F125 Baden-Württemberg class frigate
-Clemencau class aircraft carrier
-Zeven provincien class frigate
-Poolster class AOR
-Amsterdam class AOR
-Minas Gerais aircraft carrier

Top

acelanceloet

Post subject: Re: M-frigate development

Posted: May 17th, 2011, 8:36 pm

Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

no he means 'haakjes' around the description. I misunderstood that at first too

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin

Top

acelanceloet

Post subject: Re: M-frigate development

Posted: June 30th, 2011, 9:51 pm

Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

this is the 1987 concept. close to the final one, as you can see. found refs for this one recently, and I hope to be able to start on the ones I gave to mitch soon too.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin

Top

acelanceloet

Post subject: Re: M-frigate development

Posted: July 1st, 2011, 9:42 am

Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

and the concept just before this one....

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin

Top

Thiel

Post subject: Re: M-frigate development

Posted: July 1st, 2011, 3:46 pm

Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

How about mentioning which concept is which on the drawing?

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.

Top

acelanceloet

Post subject: Re: M-frigate development

Posted: July 1st, 2011, 3:51 pm

Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

well, the fact is that I have no data about that. they were both in the same publication, of 1987, while the one with the Mk 29 is of course earlier. so I could do the same with the drawings as I did with the names (one 1987 and one 1986) but I am not even sure of that.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin

Top

Gollevainen

Post subject: Re: M-frigate development

Posted: July 25th, 2011, 5:21 pm

Posts: 4714
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
Location: Finland
Contact: Website

I would like to remind all people about this little moderation I did while back ago

Now, I was pretty clear. Mitchell's worklist is MINE now. Anybody wanting to get stuff out of it, has to ask permission for it from Me. This will be last time I do friendly warning over the matter. Next time the banhammer will fall.

The air of this forum has been poisened allready too much by the arguing of ace and mitchell. Banning one of you should have solved the proplem. I seriously Do not want to return to these issues any more, but If I do, it will be the last time. Now get back drawing stuff, not claiming someone else's work just to get back at them in personal level.

_________________
Shipbucket mainsite, aka "The Archive"
New AU project "Aravala"

Top

acelanceloet

Post subject: Re: M-frigate development

Posted: September 29th, 2011, 10:38 am

Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands

I was looking around in the archive, and I found this ship...
[ img ]

anybody has any intel about it, as it seems to have some major flaws (most notably, all CIWS arnament up front and the lack of directors)
so I am wondering were this proposal comes from, as I can't find anything about it.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin

Top

DER386

Post subject: Re: M-frigate development

Posted: September 30th, 2011, 12:32 am

Posts: 41
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:36 am

acelanceloet wrote:

I was looking around in the archive, and I found this ship...
[ img ]

It looks like the "M" class design mated with the OHP class

Top

Page 3 of 4 [ 31 posts ]

Return to “Never-Built Designs” | Go to page « 1 2 3 4 »

Jump to:

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

Board index

The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC