Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 2 of 3  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 »
Author Message
WhyMe
Post subject: Re: Russian shipsPosted: February 17th, 2012, 7:04 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1616
Joined: November 12th, 2010, 4:27 pm
Location: California, USA
Contact: Website
Actually they are not even real proposals. As far as I understand these "projects" are just fantasies of artists who barely understand (if at all) naval shipbuilding. Kinda like those weird designs from old Popular Mechanics magazines.

_________________
Worklist: Portuguese Navy and Barnegat class seaplane tenders


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Gollevainen
Post subject: Re: Russian shipsPosted: February 17th, 2012, 7:05 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4714
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
Location: Finland
Contact: Website
Own designs of someone more skilled Artists than us is still own designs. Neverwhere's suffices ships that were actually designed by a naval staff/engineering burey and presented for consideration to become something by naval staff or equalent.
So you can move them back to own desing.

_________________
Shipbucket mainsite, aka "The Archive"
New AU project "Aravala"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
ALVAMA
Post subject: Re: Russian shipsPosted: February 17th, 2012, 7:22 pm
Why do I have seen a model of the first one at the St Petersburg Naval show of the first one..? ;)


Top
[Quote]
Gollevainen
Post subject: Re: Russian shipsPosted: February 17th, 2012, 7:28 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4714
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
Location: Finland
Contact: Website
couse moddeling is art too ...
Naturally, if you can provide a actually listed company or desing burey to back these ships up, then they can stay in never-where sections, other wise, I instruct my mods to remove this back to own desings

_________________
Shipbucket mainsite, aka "The Archive"
New AU project "Aravala"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
SHIPDUDE
Post subject: Re: Russian shipsPosted: February 17th, 2012, 9:07 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 145
Joined: February 17th, 2012, 5:42 am
These are losing entries from a design contest held by the United Shipbuilding Corporation of Russia! :oops:

The winning designer was hired by USC! 8-)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Portsmouth Bill
Post subject: Re: Russian shipsPosted: February 18th, 2012, 3:32 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3220
Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom
Much of what is being posted here is 'flights of fancy', and therefore this part of the forum is loosing its integrity: I'll leave it for others to police :|


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Hood
Post subject: Re: Russian shipsPosted: February 18th, 2012, 3:57 pm
Offline
Posts: 7233
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am
Golly has this correct.
Any ship posted here must be a real project that was never completed, or an unbuilt earlier version of a ship that was eventually built. It must have basis in fact and should be linked to some offical requirement or an offical shipbuilder/ design bureau. Naturally sometimes when plans have been lost or are incomplete then the artist has to fill in some of the blanks but the above should always apply and the artist should use reasonable guesswork based on the available sources they have.

If someone can provide proper proof these ships were real submissions then they can stay here. If they are speculative doodles by a bored designer then they should be in Own Designs.

_________________
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
ALVAMA
Post subject: Re: Russian shipsPosted: February 18th, 2012, 4:01 pm
Good evening guys! I just do not need 3/4 guys with the same comment. One is enough, I am not stupid am I?


Top
[Quote]
Hood
Post subject: Re: Russian shipsPosted: February 18th, 2012, 4:22 pm
Offline
Posts: 7233
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am
Alex it's not just aimed at you. Everyone should be reminded of the proper use of these forums.
I think what we've got here is 50/50, it could be a real plausiable design or it could be something a designer doodled when he was waiting for his next teabreak. I say for now we leave it here.

_________________
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Portsmouth Bill
Post subject: Re: Russian shipsPosted: February 18th, 2012, 6:50 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3220
Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom
ALVAMA wrote:
Good evening guys! I just do not need 3/4 guys with the same comment. One is enough, I am not stupid am I?
You're talking to moderators, please bear that in mind. If you'd given some background when you first posted then we would not have had to intervene, I suggest you think on that in future


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 2 of 3  [ 22 posts ]  Return to “Never-Built Designs” | Go to page « 1 2 3 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 54 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]