Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 3 of 8  [ 78 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 58 »
Author Message
ghost792
Post subject: Re: Type 26 / GCS: Late 2011 and early 2012Posted: March 25th, 2012, 10:45 pm
Offline
Posts: 34
Joined: September 8th, 2010, 12:09 am
If the Type 26 ends up with a 127mm gun, would the Type 45s receive them in a later refit?


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Philbob
Post subject: Re: Type 26 / GCS: Late 2011 and early 2012Posted: March 27th, 2012, 9:20 am
Offline
Posts: 586
Joined: July 30th, 2010, 3:45 am
i still skeptical that the the T26 will be fitted with 127's, but it is probably safe to assume between now and 2030 the Daring's will be up gunned.

_________________
Supreme Commander of the Astrofleets


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
rifleman
Post subject: Re: Type 26 / GCS: Late 2011 and early 2012Posted: March 27th, 2012, 2:30 pm
Offline
Posts: 501
Joined: September 4th, 2010, 8:44 am
RP1 wrote:
Quote:
is the 127mm confrimed? be interesting to see what gun ends up on them. I suspect at present it'll be recovered 4.5's to keep supply chain simple and save cost.
An early design, shown in CGI and a model, had a 4.5'', but all the later designs have used the Italian 127mm - including the one with what looks like a badly scaled 76mm (wrong model purchased from TurboSquid?).

The thing is that sticking with the 4.5'' only saves money in the short term - i.e. it eases cashflow. Given that the 4.5'' shell seems to be in a developmental dead-end, it is *highly* likely that, over the lifetime of the ships, the 127mm, and it's guided shells, would be adopted. Fitting them up-front would probably be cheaper, but it may come down to cashflow on the day.

RP1
thing is RP1 its not just the epense of buying 127mm's its the cost of retraining all the gunfitters and crews, The complication of having 2 sets of spares and ammunition in the supply train at a stroke you have to cut the ammount of Ammunition carried by RFA's as you have to carry 2 natures, the same goes at the Ammunition depots. For NGFS teams it also means having to remember which has which. Yeap the Mk8 is at the end of its devlopment. I do hope that the 155mm comes back to play as its a very flexible round and if its the same as is in the army supply chain simplifies things.

_________________
"There was nothing wrong with Titanic when she left the Shipyard" Tim McGarry Belfast Comedian


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Philbob
Post subject: Re: Type 26 / GCS: Late 2011 and early 2012Posted: March 27th, 2012, 2:41 pm
Offline
Posts: 586
Joined: July 30th, 2010, 3:45 am
BAE is developing/proposing the 155 AGS "Lite" for the Flight III DDG-51's.

_________________
Supreme Commander of the Astrofleets


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
RP1
Post subject: Re: Type 26 / GCS: Late 2011 and early 2012Posted: March 27th, 2012, 3:21 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 208
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 8:48 pm
Location: Engerlands
Contact: Website
Rifleman, all these things are true to some extent - loss so the RFA bit where you are still carrying the same number of rounds, minus the reduction due to the increased size, but you have to use modern warehousing techniques - which are going to be used anyway, as RFA is having to get more flexible in order to meet NATO and EU integration "plans". Assuming it turns out to be possible, of course. The same thing applies to 155mm - there have been questions as to whether it really saves that much on a well-managed modern supply chain.

However, there is something called "spend to save". UK-only equipment is very expensive. Challenger-2 was to be re-gunned with 120mm smoothbore under a similar scheme, and despite all the costs in retraining, buying new ammunition etc, it would still have been cheaper over the lifespan of the tanks, rather than remanufacturing the 120mm rifled ammunition to continue as-is. Ultimately, that plan was nixed due to - as I pointed out - cashflow. There was just no money to do anything with the main rifles, regardless of what it would save in the long term.

FWIW personally I expect the ships to have Mk8 as built, again, due to cashflow. There will be much talk about re-gunning, but it will never happen and the UK will persist with it's own special calibre for as long as possible, but then I'm such a well-known optimist. The two possible ways this could be avoided are: Oto-Melara makes much of the Good European angle, or more sensibly, they open a factory in the UK.

RP1

_________________
"Yes siree, the excitement never stops." Togusa, Ghost in the Shell


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
rifleman
Post subject: Re: Type 26 / GCS: Late 2011 and early 2012Posted: March 27th, 2012, 11:46 pm
Offline
Posts: 501
Joined: September 4th, 2010, 8:44 am
RP say for example RFA Regent currently carries 10000 rounds of 4.5 in HE if in future the type 26 has a 127mm gun and the type 45 has the 4.5 then Regent would need to split its storage of HE to 2 natures say making 5,000 rounds of 4.5 & 5,000 rounds of 127mm so effectivley you have reduced the natures by 50% in your 2nd line holdings. It is difficult.
I do agree with. I would prefer we went 155mm derived from AS90 from a pure gunnery perspective it makes NGFS more interesting.

_________________
"There was nothing wrong with Titanic when she left the Shipyard" Tim McGarry Belfast Comedian


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Philbob
Post subject: Re: Type 26 / GCS: Late 2011 and early 2012Posted: March 28th, 2012, 3:48 am
Offline
Posts: 586
Joined: July 30th, 2010, 3:45 am
what is the Regent?

_________________
Supreme Commander of the Astrofleets


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: Type 26 / GCS: Late 2011 and early 2012Posted: March 28th, 2012, 6:03 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
A486 RFA Regent was broadly the Equivalent to the Mars Class Combat Stores ships (AFS).

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Philbob
Post subject: Re: Type 26 / GCS: Late 2011 and early 2012Posted: May 4th, 2012, 7:37 am
Offline
Posts: 586
Joined: July 30th, 2010, 3:45 am
http://ukarmedforcescommentary.blogspot ... fleet.html

type 26 is increasingly being finalized.

_________________
Supreme Commander of the Astrofleets


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
MC Spoilt B'stard
Post subject: Re: Type 26 / GCS: Late 2011 and early 2012Posted: May 8th, 2012, 2:15 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 498
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:52 pm
Location: Willemstad, Curacao
Well , i think the UK should go with the 127 mm LW instead of theire 114 mm or a 155 mm because the limitations of a UK only system and because 155 mm rounds are realy heavy for frigate's and (not sure) but i remind me somehow that BAE systems postponed production of guided 155mm rounds. And i dont see a problem for future cargo ships if UK will replace the 114 mm's for 127 mm in her entire fleet Type 26 and Type 45 (in update) and posible other future combatants, even the french navy switched from theire own 100 mm's to 76 mm as a more NATO/EU standard.

And i dont know if anyone noticed but the T26 impressions released by BAE systems in 2012 show a VLS in the funnel construction and i couldn't find it in the drawing yet. As told on the UK Armed Forces blog it could be a VLS for up to 24 missile's.

BTW: great drawing, cant wait for the final design to be announced.

Some screenshots as found on th Blog

[ img ]
Front closeup

[ img ]
Posible 24 cell VLS for Tommahawk Strik missile's

_________________
Vi coactus
Door geweld gedwongen
Forced by violence
------
Caption signing treaty with England by Johan de Witt

[Working List]
None


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 3 of 8  [ 78 posts ]  Return to “Never-Built Designs” | Go to page « 1 2 3 4 58 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]