» »

Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 2 of 6  [ 51 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5 6 »
[Print view]
Author Message
MihoshiK
Post subject: Re: CGBLPosted: October 14th, 2011, 6:22 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1035
Joined: October 16th, 2010, 11:06 pm
Location: In orbit, watching you draw.
Contact: Website
Hm, Tim, considering the location and the fact that they appear angled to the front/back in the lineart, I think that's not a smaller set of intakes on the forward superstructure above the regular ones, but rather a location for chaff launchers.

_________________
Would you please not eat my gun...
[ img ]
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: CGBLPosted: October 14th, 2011, 8:28 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
MihoshiK wrote:
Hm, Tim, considering the location and the fact that they appear angled to the front/back in the lineart, I think that's not a smaller set of intakes on the forward superstructure above the regular ones, but rather a location for chaff launchers.
Quite possibly.

One issue I am having is that the uptakes are just not big enough. I may add a second row below the current ones.

_________________
πŒπ€π“π‡ππ„π“- 𝑻𝒐 π‘ͺπ’π’ˆπ’Šπ’•π’‚π’•π’† 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Hood
Post subject: Re: CGBLPosted: October 15th, 2011, 10:41 am
Offline
Posts: 7215
Joined: July 31st, 2010, 10:07 am
Overall its looking good. A very purposeful design that somehoe reminds me of those unbuilt early 1960s Soviet cruisers in overall appearance.

_________________
Hood's Worklist
English Electric Canberra FD
Interwar RN Capital Ships
Super-Darings
Never-Were British Aircraft
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: CGBLPosted: October 16th, 2011, 3:44 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
Depreciated

_________________
πŒπ€π“π‡ππ„π“- 𝑻𝒐 π‘ͺπ’π’ˆπ’Šπ’•π’‚π’•π’† 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
ghost792
Post subject: Re: CGBLPosted: October 16th, 2011, 10:38 pm
Offline
Posts: 34
Joined: September 8th, 2010, 12:09 am
Nice work. I found out about the CGBL a few years ago and I've been fascinated with it ever since. One peculiar thing, though, not with your work, but the design itself. Why only three missile directors instead of four like the Ticos? It seems odd that the Navy would hamper a CG's capabilities in that way.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: CGBLPosted: October 16th, 2011, 10:53 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
ghost792 wrote:
Nice work. I found out about the CGBL a few years ago and I've been fascinated with it ever since. One peculiar thing, though, not with your work, but the design itself. Why only three missile directors instead of four like the Ticos? It seems odd that the Navy would hamper a CG's capabilities in that way.
I'm presuming that the forward directors are side-by-side, just as they are on the Ticos themselves. It really does contrary to the idea of building built to Burke standards (something that Erik just said to me, and I happen to agree with it). I am looking at tracking down where the painting is so that a higher resolution image might someday make it online. Until then I'm stuck with what I've posted here (and on a couple of other forums).

_________________
πŒπ€π“π‡ππ„π“- 𝑻𝒐 π‘ͺπ’π’ˆπ’Šπ’•π’‚π’•π’† 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Karle94
Post subject: Re: CGBLPosted: October 17th, 2011, 1:06 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2111
Joined: November 8th, 2010, 3:07 pm
Location: Norseland
Nice ship and good work. Should`t the Harpoon launchers face outwards, instead of inwards?
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: CGBLPosted: October 17th, 2011, 1:14 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
Best guess I have is that they cross fire across the bow.

_________________
πŒπ€π“π‡ππ„π“- 𝑻𝒐 π‘ͺπ’π’ˆπ’Šπ’•π’‚π’•π’† 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
ghost792
Post subject: Re: CGBLPosted: October 17th, 2011, 2:48 am
Offline
Posts: 34
Joined: September 8th, 2010, 12:09 am
The Navy started positioning the Harpoon tubes to fire across the opposite side they were mounted on so that the missiles' exhaust could be directed overboard. It made protecting the ship from the exhaust far easier.
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Morten812
Post subject: Re: CGBLPosted: October 17th, 2011, 8:36 am
Offline
Posts: 281
Joined: September 16th, 2011, 7:02 am
Location: Denmark
Contact: Website
looks great, apart from the aft funnel being the tallest, just my humble opinion.

_________________
Morten812

Morten Jensen
Randers
Denmark

Traffic Manager
Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 2 of 6  [ 51 posts ]  Return to β€œNever-Built Designs” | Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5 6 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests

The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]