Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 1 of 1  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
acelanceloet
Post subject: US navy MLPPosted: May 18th, 2011, 7:45 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
WIP!
I need some help with the mast and detailing, as I now as good as nothing of US navy auxilary ships.....
[ img ]
the design and colours are based on an drawing I found on an shipyard PDF, the ship is already in construction but as the drawing wasn't very accurate and the sources are in disagreement, I put this one in neverbuild designs for now.

I hope on some feedback, comments and ideas, but please don't point out the obvious things (such as 'it needs lights and mooring gear) or the fact that she is ugly as hell (I agree on that) but more the general design things, such as what instruments to put in that huge mast, how to detail that ramp or what hull number she would most likely have.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
rd77
Post subject: Re: US navy MLPPosted: May 20th, 2011, 9:29 am
Offline
Posts: 219
Joined: November 2nd, 2010, 11:36 am
Location: The Hague, Netherlands
For those who weren't aware of this ship (like myself), here is some background info:

http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/The ... ips-06525/

The article is mainly interesting for the background info, as the picture in the article depicts a quite different vessel (converted tanker, looks a lot like the AMERICAN CORMORANT actually). Would not want to be on that low deck in a bad storm, so I guess it's just as well that the USN is building a brand new and quite different vessel!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: US navy MLPPosted: May 20th, 2011, 5:58 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
just to say... that is no heavy tanker, but an modified dockwise Tern class ship..... semisubmersible, just as the ship I'm drawing. that one was one of the concepts, btw, ALVAMA will be doing that one soon.

btw, I really need some help guys! every bit of intel or every suggestion is helpful....

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: US navy MLPPosted: June 13th, 2011, 3:11 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
[ img ]
well, IMO, she's finished. if anybody has comments, please go ahead, I won't submit this one for the current upload session because I am not yet entirely pleased with it, and I hope during the coming period new information comes up so I can improve this drawing and submit it to real designs.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: US navy MLPPosted: June 13th, 2011, 3:20 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Even with the advances in comms technology, I'd still expect to see a veritable forest of antennas on a ship like this.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: US navy MLPPosted: June 13th, 2011, 3:28 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
comms for what? it is more or less an freighter or an floating load/unload station, and I already think the amount of satcoms is.... well..... high. the antenna's and satcoms I have on are the ones shown on my reference, but as my refs weren't that good....

I guess I'll just have to wait till the real ship is finished.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: US navy MLPPosted: June 13th, 2011, 3:36 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
acelanceloet wrote:
comms for what? it is more or less an freighter or an floating load/unload station, and I already think the amount of satcoms is.... well..... high. the antenna's and satcoms I have on are the ones shown on my reference, but as my refs weren't that good....

I guess I'll just have to wait till the real ship is finished.
Coordinating said unloading. Getting a normal RO-PAX ferry loaded is a major piece of logistical choreography and they have the advantage of purpose build shore facilities.
The MLP on the other hand will be doing it mid-ocean and instead of family cars and trucks it's got to deal with multi ton AFVs, helicopters, artillery and all their support equipment. Just making sure that a Howitzer's ammunition goes to the same place as the howitzer is going to be a challenge. And the key to that challenge is communication and that means bandwidth and lots of it.
Plus, a SatComm won't do much good if you're trying to talk to the landing craft that's alongside.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 1 of 1  [ 7 posts ]  Return to “Never-Built Designs”

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]