Shipbucket

please point out the mistakes I most likely have made. I have altered as less as possible of the original drawing, as it was good work, but it had some flaws and the recent parts updates left me with the thought that this magnificent ship needed an update.
so here it is:

please comment as soon as possible, so I might be able to submit this one for the current upload session still.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin

I'd like to see the old version so I can know what I'm comparing to.

ok

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin

Nice update, but do you have a picture or drawing that show the prop arrangement? The way it's been drawn now it looks like a weird mix between a twin and a single screw arrangement. Unless, of course, the Amsterdam has a very unusual hull.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.

I have the plans here:
http://www.knvts.nl/S&W%20archief/Bevoo ... terdam.pdf
no picture that shows the arrengement of the axis really good, but working from different pictures and this plan, I think I have made it quite good: it is an single prop, with the supports going to the side.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin