| Shipbucket http://67.205.157.234/forums/ |
|
| Mary celeste (amazon) 1861 http://67.205.157.234/forums/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=76 |
Page 1 of 3 |
| Author: | didibii [ August 3rd, 2010, 9:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Mary celeste (amazon) 1861 |
This is still a WIP but i just felt like uploading it becoues i want to know my mistakes and how it looks,becouse i am having some problems with it.By the way this is my 2nd drawing of a real ship (i have drawn my own ships befor) and my 3rd drawing of an old ship so i am pretty new at drawing this kind of ship. ![[ img ]](http://i748.photobucket.com/albums/xx123/turkishnavyguy/template20L201.png) ![[ img ]](http://i748.photobucket.com/albums/xx123/turkishnavyguy/800px-Mary_Celeste_as_Amazon_in_1861.jpg) So please comment and tell me what you think. |
|
| Author: | acelanceloet [ August 3rd, 2010, 9:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Mary celeste (amazon) 1861 |
may I suggest you stop on this ship, and select an easier one... sailing ships are extremely hard, and only the best in here have good results on them. also, it looks like your reference isn't an exact sideview, which isn't correct. I think it is an beatifull ship, and I suggest you return to her later, but I think it is a bit too much when you are new. |
|
| Author: | didibii [ August 3rd, 2010, 9:20 pm ] | |
| Post subject: | Re: Mary celeste (amazon) 1861 | |
may I suggest you stop on this ship, and select an easier one... sailing ships are extremely hard, and only the best in here have good results on them. also, it looks like your reference isn't an exact sideview, which isn't correct. I think it is an beatifull ship, and I suggest you return to her later, but I think it is a bit too much when you are new.
Ok thanks for the edvice,And yes i think its one of the most beatifull ship of its time.
|
||
| Author: | klagldsf [ August 4th, 2010, 7:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Mary celeste (amazon) 1861 |
Yeah, first of all, there are like zero good references on this particular ship. Second of all, what you are using currently certainly does not count as a suitable reference. I'd at the very least would look through any referenced links in the Wikipedia article as a good start, or use the resources here at the forum for help. |
|
| Author: | Lazer_one [ August 4th, 2010, 7:31 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Mary celeste (amazon) 1861 |
It is a quite famous ship and it is considered the first "ghost ship": it was found without crew and passengers close to Gibraltar. Also the painting is quite famous and gives the proportions of a typical "merchant brig". As said Acelanceloet it would be a quite challenging start but as said Mohamad Alì "Impossible is Nothing!". |
|
| Author: | ezgo394 [ August 5th, 2010, 2:44 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Mary celeste (amazon) 1861 |
You could probably look up the length on wikipedia and then convert it to SB scale, but it is still not a very credible source. |
|
| Author: | didibii [ August 5th, 2010, 2:56 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Mary celeste (amazon) 1861 |
Yea i know it is known as a GOST SHIP but i dont think thats true.And i am still kinda working on it,im drawning on it like 20 minutes a day then draw my other ships.but its a very hard to draw ship so i draw peace by peace i try my best at drawning it. Now it actually looks better then this. |
|
| Author: | ezgo394 [ August 5th, 2010, 3:02 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Mary celeste (amazon) 1861 |
Well, if you've added to it, then post it. |
|
| Author: | Lazer_one [ August 5th, 2010, 1:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Mary celeste (amazon) 1861 |
Pay attention to the scale. The Mary Celeste was only 31 m: a very small brig! ![[ img ]](http://i540.photobucket.com/albums/gg335/lazer_one/MaryCeleste.png)
|
|
| Author: | Novice [ August 5th, 2010, 4:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Mary celeste (amazon) 1861 |
It should be around 200pixels long, then. |
|
| Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|