Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 1 of 2  [ 13 posts ]  Go to page 1 2 »
Author Message
heuhen
Post subject: Oslo classPosted: February 15th, 2012, 5:40 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9089
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
HNoMS Oslo

This is the version that was up to upload but never got uploaded.... even when it was on the list!!
[ img ]


But here is the redo version, and I hope this one get uploaded and that "RAR"-file i send for almost a 3/4 month ago with the clean version of the Norwegian list get uploaded!!

This is HNoMS Oslo, as hove she looked like at that day she ran aground and sank.
[ img ]


edit: Oslo class use the same hull as Dealey class but the hull has been built higher to withstand the North Sea!
The radar is my version of Siemens Plessey AWS-9(2D) surveillance and target-indication radar.


Last edited by heuhen on February 15th, 2012, 5:48 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Wolfman
Post subject: Re: Oslo classPosted: February 15th, 2012, 5:41 pm
Offline
Posts: 254
Joined: July 26th, 2011, 6:48 pm
Wow... very nice work, heuhen.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Portsmouth Bill
Post subject: Re: Oslo classPosted: February 15th, 2012, 5:47 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3220
Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom
Am I right, the two differ in length? Also, I can't see what the logic is in the weird hull shading? That apart, very nice :)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
bezobrazov
Post subject: Re: Oslo classPosted: February 15th, 2012, 5:48 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3406
Joined: July 29th, 2010, 2:20 pm
Heuhen, 100% improved! Very, very impressive!

_________________
My Avatar:Петр Алексеевич Безобразов (Petr Alekseevich Bezobrazov), Вице-адмирал , царская ВМФ России(1845-1906) - I sign my drawings as Ari Saarinen


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Oslo classPosted: February 15th, 2012, 5:56 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9089
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
Portsmouth Bill wrote:
Am I right, the two differ in length?


Every ship in Oslo class (Oslo, Bergen, Trondheim, Stavanger and Narvik) is 96,6m that's 294,44 ft and not 316 ft as Wikipedia says! and in pixels that is: 588,9px and not 634 px that is 45px in differences. and you can also note that this vessel use the same hull as Dealey class just the forward hull was customized to suit Norwegian sea conditions better (higher freeboard)
Portsmouth Bill wrote:
Also, I can't see what the logic is in the weird hull shading? That apart, very nice :)
That the hull shading I haw always been doing!

but thanks for the comment!


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
heuhen
Post subject: Re: Oslo classPosted: February 15th, 2012, 5:58 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 9089
Joined: December 15th, 2010, 10:13 pm
Location: Behind you, looking at you with my mustache!
bezobrazov wrote:
Heuhen, 100% improved! Very, very impressive!
thanks. I decided to do her when i just for fun checked her length on Wikipedia, and found out that every ships in there have been transformed from meters to feet wrong. the i checked the drawing and just... "LOL".


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
WhyMe
Post subject: Re: Oslo classPosted: February 15th, 2012, 6:07 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1616
Joined: November 12th, 2010, 4:27 pm
Location: California, USA
Contact: Website
heuhen wrote:
96,6m that's 294,44 ft and not 316 ft as Wikipedia says!
It's a bit confusing, because 96,6m = 316.9 feet, considering we're using the international foot that's equal to 30.48cm

_________________
Worklist: Portuguese Navy and Barnegat class seaplane tenders


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Portsmouth Bill
Post subject: Re: Oslo classPosted: February 15th, 2012, 6:07 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3220
Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom
Right. Re the length, that's fine, but have you got the hull accurate? Are you using reference drawings? What I mean is that the stern is entirely diferent to any drawing I've seen on the basic Dealey. If (as you say) the Norwegian class had a raised bow, but the stern remained unchanged, then it is incorrect. Also:
Quote:
That the hull shading I haw always been doing!
I'm not sure if this translates fully into English. But are you saying "This is the hull shading I have always been doing"? If so, then that is just not good enough; sorry, but we are not in AU here, you will have to give a real reason for the shading - that does not seem to have any useful function - and please don't reply that it is on a whim - that won't be acceptable.

I'm not being unduly hard here, but ensuring the standards are kept up :)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Bombhead
Post subject: Re: Oslo classPosted: February 15th, 2012, 6:13 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2299
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 7:41 pm
That is a top class drawing. :D


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
TimothyC
Post subject: Re: Oslo classPosted: February 15th, 2012, 6:18 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3765
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:06 am
Contact: Website
96.6m is 316.9 feet, or in this case 634 pixels.

_________________
𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐇𝐍𝐄𝐓- 𝑻𝒐 𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 1 of 2  [ 13 posts ]  Return to “Real Designs” | Go to page 1 2 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]