Shipbucket
http://67.205.157.234/forums/

Pr. 11356 Update
http://67.205.157.234/forums/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=1536
Page 1 of 2

Author:  Gollevainen [ July 15th, 2011, 2:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Pr. 11356 Update

Well nothing fancy this time. I just took the MConrads old Talwar into table, added some shade, removed some lines that didn't exist and repaired the Bridge which was quite wrongly presented. I also replaced the ordanance with the newer variants and added my drawn underwater hull. As the whole class seems to be in intersting reneisance, I also included the Teg class follow on's as well as the Russians very own Admiral Essin class that was just laid down.

[ img ]
[ img ]
[ img ]

Author:  erik_t [ July 15th, 2011, 2:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Pr. 11356 Update

I sort of assumed any future use of SA-N-7/12 would be via VLS. The Russians are still building new arm launchers?

Author:  Gollevainen [ July 15th, 2011, 2:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Pr. 11356 Update

Yea apparently. There have been models of the ship with the VLS, but atleast the arm-launcher is going to be fitted on the repeat-talwars which are nearing completion, and the consensus in russian boards seems to be that arm-launcher would be fitted to the first Russian versions of the ship. Needless to say, the devolpment of the VLS Sthill is propably facing some proplems.

Author:  Philbob [ July 15th, 2011, 6:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Pr. 11356 Update

that is a intresting propeller design.

Author:  klagldsf [ July 15th, 2011, 8:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Pr. 11356 Update

A relatively small arm launcher like that would, in all honestly, contribute negligibly to the RCS of a ship anyway.

Author:  rd77 [ July 16th, 2011, 8:27 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Pr. 11356 Update

What is that huge missile on the Teg class? Brahmos? Yakhont?

Author:  Thiel [ July 16th, 2011, 8:43 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Pr. 11356 Update

BrahMos

Author:  erik_t [ July 16th, 2011, 2:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Pr. 11356 Update

klagldsf wrote:
A relatively small arm launcher like that would, in all honestly, contribute negligibly to the RCS of a ship anyway.
What makes you think the superiority of VLS is primarily a function of radar cross section?

Author:  Frankiewicz [ July 16th, 2011, 6:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Pr. 11356 Update

11356 Model

Author:  klagldsf [ July 17th, 2011, 6:28 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Pr. 11356 Update

erik_t wrote:
klagldsf wrote:
A relatively small arm launcher like that would, in all honestly, contribute negligibly to the RCS of a ship anyway.
What makes you think the superiority of VLS is primarily a function of radar cross section?
What makes you think I implied that? :P

Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
https://www.phpbb.com/