Shipbucket http://67.205.157.234/forums/ |
|
Pr. 11356 Update http://67.205.157.234/forums/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=1536 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | Gollevainen [ July 15th, 2011, 2:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | Pr. 11356 Update |
Well nothing fancy this time. I just took the MConrads old Talwar into table, added some shade, removed some lines that didn't exist and repaired the Bridge which was quite wrongly presented. I also replaced the ordanance with the newer variants and added my drawn underwater hull. As the whole class seems to be in intersting reneisance, I also included the Teg class follow on's as well as the Russians very own Admiral Essin class that was just laid down. |
Author: | erik_t [ July 15th, 2011, 2:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Pr. 11356 Update |
I sort of assumed any future use of SA-N-7/12 would be via VLS. The Russians are still building new arm launchers? |
Author: | Gollevainen [ July 15th, 2011, 2:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Pr. 11356 Update |
Yea apparently. There have been models of the ship with the VLS, but atleast the arm-launcher is going to be fitted on the repeat-talwars which are nearing completion, and the consensus in russian boards seems to be that arm-launcher would be fitted to the first Russian versions of the ship. Needless to say, the devolpment of the VLS Sthill is propably facing some proplems. |
Author: | Philbob [ July 15th, 2011, 6:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Pr. 11356 Update |
that is a intresting propeller design. |
Author: | klagldsf [ July 15th, 2011, 8:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Pr. 11356 Update |
A relatively small arm launcher like that would, in all honestly, contribute negligibly to the RCS of a ship anyway. |
Author: | rd77 [ July 16th, 2011, 8:27 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Pr. 11356 Update |
What is that huge missile on the Teg class? Brahmos? Yakhont? |
Author: | Thiel [ July 16th, 2011, 8:43 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Pr. 11356 Update |
BrahMos |
Author: | erik_t [ July 16th, 2011, 2:32 pm ] | |
Post subject: | Re: Pr. 11356 Update | |
A relatively small arm launcher like that would, in all honestly, contribute negligibly to the RCS of a ship anyway.
What makes you think the superiority of VLS is primarily a function of radar cross section?
|
Author: | Frankiewicz [ July 16th, 2011, 6:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Pr. 11356 Update |
11356 Model |
Author: | klagldsf [ July 17th, 2011, 6:28 am ] | ||
Post subject: | Re: Pr. 11356 Update | ||
A relatively small arm launcher like that would, in all honestly, contribute negligibly to the RCS of a ship anyway.
What makes you think the superiority of VLS is primarily a function of radar cross section? |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |