Shipbucket http://67.205.157.234/forums/ |
|
USS Spruance 1980 http://67.205.157.234/forums/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=1478 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | acelanceloet [ July 2nd, 2011, 10:59 am ] |
Post subject: | USS Spruance 1980 |
it was missing in the archive, so I made her. |
Author: | ReiAyanami [ July 2nd, 2011, 11:15 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: USS Spruance 1980 |
It is a pitty that the USN scrapped and sunk most of them, IMO before their time. |
Author: | Thiel [ July 2nd, 2011, 1:22 pm ] | |
Post subject: | Re: USS Spruance 1980 | |
It is a pitty that the USN scrapped and sunk most of them, IMO before their time.
Not really. AFAIK most of them had fatigue issues, and ff they hadn't the USN wouldn't have gotten nearly as many Arleigh Burkes
|
Author: | erik_t [ July 5th, 2011, 10:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: USS Spruance 1980 |
A nice update to what is still a fine drawing. |
Author: | Colosseum [ July 6th, 2011, 5:49 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: USS Spruance 1980 |
Yes, though I'm curious how changing a few parts around warrants the addition of your name to the credits... |
Author: | Gollevainen [ July 6th, 2011, 7:34 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: USS Spruance 1980 |
Yea I agree, adding just newly done weapons really shouldnt suffice for crediting oneself, and expecially to do such in order to just get one's credits into the drawing is IMO bit lame. Back in the ol' days we have had some quarrels about this and I think we came to pretty gentlemen's agreement that we either a. wont even do such and let the orginal artist to keep up their drawings to update or b. if we do it, the drawing actually needs a considerable attention in actuall drawing wise to suffice for crediting (Back then it was easy becouse most ships lacked underwaterhulls thus they were added along with other updates) |
Author: | acelanceloet [ July 6th, 2011, 7:56 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: USS Spruance 1980 |
if it was just swapping a few parts, I would agree. but I did most of the shading, added that sloop instead of the RHIB, made some fixes to the hangar etc. IMO, that would be sufficient for credits, if it really is not, I will remove it. this was more an sidewalk from the mk 71 spruance, because that one was 99% this one while this one was not yet put in the archive. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |