Shipbucket http://67.205.157.234/forums/ |
|
French cruiser http://67.205.157.234/forums/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=1358 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | ALVAMA [ June 13th, 2011, 11:00 am ] |
Post subject: | French cruiser |
Author: | Rodondo [ June 13th, 2011, 11:05 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: French cruiser |
Beautiful but an interesting number of funnels and placement |
Author: | Mitchell van Os [ June 13th, 2011, 11:44 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: French cruiser |
I quess 4 funnels and a lot of vent pipes? |
Author: | ALVAMA [ June 13th, 2011, 12:19 pm ] | |
Post subject: | Re: French cruiser | |
I quess 4 funnels and a lot of vent pipes?
Yeas
|
Author: | bezobrazov [ June 13th, 2011, 1:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: French cruiser |
Actually four funnels and an auxilliary funnel and a lot of vents...though not as bad as the later cruisers which featured six funnels and the obligatory auxilliary one (making it seven (7!) ) funnels - and a lot of vents! |
Author: | erik_t [ June 13th, 2011, 4:04 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: French cruiser |
A puny four funnels? Lexington is not impressed |
Author: | Gollevainen [ June 13th, 2011, 4:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: French cruiser |
five? Vikings laugth at you |
Author: | Thiel [ June 13th, 2011, 4:47 pm ] | |
Post subject: | Re: French cruiser | |
five? Vikings laugth at you
If I'm interpreting the top view correctly. the Lexingtons would have had seven funnels.
|
Author: | Mitchell van Os [ June 13th, 2011, 6:59 pm ] | ||
Post subject: | Re: French cruiser | ||
five? Vikings laugth at you
If I'm interpreting the top view correctly. the Lexingtons would have had seven funnels. |
Author: | Thiel [ June 13th, 2011, 7:04 pm ] | |
Post subject: | Re: French cruiser | |
There where more designs as one...
I'm obviously referring to the one erik_t posted
|
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |