Shipbucket http://67.205.157.234/forums/ |
|
Submarines http://67.205.157.234/forums/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=281 |
Page 90 of 100 |
Author: | eswube [ March 23rd, 2016, 8:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Submarines |
Excellent. ![]() |
Author: | darthpanda [ March 23rd, 2016, 10:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Submarines |
Akula with new skins PLA Pr.971 Akula ![]() PLA Pr.971M Akula II - K335 Gepard ![]() India - Pr.971M Akula II ![]() and Kilo with new skins PL Pr.877B Kilo ![]() |
Author: | adenandy [ March 23rd, 2016, 10:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Submarines |
:O BEAUTIFUL work DP ![]() Stunning, as ALWAYS my friend...... ![]() Well Done ![]() |
Author: | BB1987 [ March 23rd, 2016, 11:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Submarines |
I'm a t loss of words, those Akulas are a marvel. |
Author: | citizen lambda [ March 23rd, 2016, 11:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Submarines |
DarthPanda, the Akulas are even better than before somehow, that's impressive... Still, I'm surprised by the variation in proportions between the 3 variants, I would have thought that the hull was the same at least between the Chakra and the baseline version? Also, is there any reason why the handrails are not shown on all? Not a critic, just wondering how should show this kind of things were I to take on submarines seriously. |
Author: | erik_t [ March 24th, 2016, 1:27 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Submarines |
These probably set the new standard. Just fabulous detailing. It's not that you're using more pixels, necessarily, it's that you're one of the very best at using them. Which, when it all comes down to it, is the whole point of Shipbucket. |
Author: | reytuerto [ March 24th, 2016, 2:27 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Submarines |
![]() |
Author: | darthpanda [ March 24th, 2016, 7:12 am ] | |
Post subject: | Re: Submarines | |
DarthPanda, the Akulas are even better than before somehow, that's impressive...
He! Now I see it INS Chakra is too long, I will chang it in the weekend, at this moment there are 4 version of Akula, I did 3 and I see that some of my title are wrong too, it must be: Still, I'm surprised by the variation in proportions between the 3 variants, I would have thought that the hull was the same at least between the Chakra and the baseline version? Also, is there any reason why the handrails are not shown on all? Not a critic, just wondering how should show this kind of things were I to take on submarines seriously. Pr.971 Akula I Pr.971 Akula Improved -> coming soon Pr. 971U Akula II -> INS Chakra Pr. 971M Akula III -> K-335 |
Author: | zagoreni010 [ March 24th, 2016, 8:43 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Submarines |
Impressive work, as always |
Author: | Hood [ March 24th, 2016, 9:52 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Submarines |
DP is definitely the master of submarines, no matter what era or size or type he makes a superb job every time. |
Page 90 of 100 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited https://www.phpbb.com/ |