Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 4 of 9  [ 90 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5 69 »
Author Message
KimWerner
Post subject: Re: AO Class RFA Argus A135Posted: March 22nd, 2011, 3:37 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2195
Joined: December 22nd, 2010, 12:13 pm
Location: Denmark
Now I've finished the old version of RFA Argus. I'm not pleased 'cause she looks terrible and wrong. But when rules are more important than a ship looks right, so be it. The definition real designs is then questionable. As she looks here she rather should be in AU.
However here she is. I'm not sure I will make the new version complete. Maybe if I can be customary to look at this peculiarly looks? :?

[Edit] Attachment moved to page 6

_________________
Work in progress:
DD County Class PNS Babur (1982)(PAK)
FF Type 21 Class D182 PNS Babur (2000)(PAK)
All relevant Coat of Arms


Last edited by KimWerner on March 27th, 2011, 3:14 am, edited 3 times in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Gollevainen
Post subject: Re: AO Class RFA Argus A135Posted: March 22nd, 2011, 3:55 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4702
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
Location: Finland
Contact: Website
Its not about ship looks or rules as rules, but about shipbucket as a style. It is uniform drawing style that has set of rules to make it as uniform. I cannot see any proplem with this. Sure one can drawn pixel art in other ways too, but to drawn shipbucket way, one needs to follow the style as it is intended.

_________________
Shipbucket mainsite, aka "The Archive"
New AU project "Aravala"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
KimWerner
Post subject: Re: AO Class RFA Argus A135Posted: March 22nd, 2011, 4:21 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2195
Joined: December 22nd, 2010, 12:13 pm
Location: Denmark
Gollevainen wrote:
Its not about ship looks or rules as rules, but about shipbucket as a style. It is uniform drawing style that has set of rules to make it as uniform. I cannot see any proplem with this. Sure one can drawn pixel art in other ways too, but to drawn shipbucket way, one needs to follow the style as it is intended.
That's why I've finished her, but you must admit she don't look good (maybe in SB style but not compared to reality)!

_________________
Work in progress:
DD County Class PNS Babur (1982)(PAK)
FF Type 21 Class D182 PNS Babur (2000)(PAK)
All relevant Coat of Arms


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Bombhead
Post subject: Re: AO Class RFA Argus A135Posted: March 22nd, 2011, 5:13 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2299
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 7:41 pm
Hey Kim great job on Argus.Would you like to finish this one off,I got bored with it,not enough guns.

[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Portsmouth Bill
Post subject: Re: AO Class RFA Argus A135Posted: March 22nd, 2011, 6:16 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3220
Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom
It looks o.k. and its a good drawing. The point is that Golly is spot on with what this forum is about: Shipbucket style. If we want our drawings uploaded to the archive we have to adapt them likewise; and if we post them for comment we have to accept that they will be judged by the common standards.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
KimWerner
Post subject: Re: AO Class RFA Argus A135Posted: March 22nd, 2011, 6:37 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2195
Joined: December 22nd, 2010, 12:13 pm
Location: Denmark
Bombhead wrote:
Hey Kim great job on Argus.Would you like to finish this one off,I got bored with it,not enough guns.
Thanks and certainly indeed I will :D It comes like an orange in the turban of two reasons: First I was looking for a new project, and second because the Fort Class was in my wish list.
Portsmouth Bill wrote:
It looks o.k. and its a good drawing. The point is that Golly is spot on with what this forum is about: Shipbucket style. If we want our drawings uploaded to the archive we have to adapt them likewise; and if we post them for comment we have to accept that they will be judged by the common standards.
Yeah, I know, but sometimes a man have to challenge rules for else all development will stop. :mrgreen: Maybe - when I'm finish annoying me - I will do the new Argus complete. After all she is now between 80% and 90% done. ;)

_________________
Work in progress:
DD County Class PNS Babur (1982)(PAK)
FF Type 21 Class D182 PNS Babur (2000)(PAK)
All relevant Coat of Arms


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
rifleman
Post subject: Re: AO Class RFA Argus A135Posted: March 22nd, 2011, 9:53 pm
Offline
Posts: 501
Joined: September 4th, 2010, 8:44 am
Kim much better job than I was making of argus well done she looks great looking forward to the "New" version

_________________
"There was nothing wrong with Titanic when she left the Shipyard" Tim McGarry Belfast Comedian


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
KimWerner
Post subject: Re: AO Class RFA Argus A135Posted: March 22nd, 2011, 10:33 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2195
Joined: December 22nd, 2010, 12:13 pm
Location: Denmark
rifleman wrote:
Kim much better job than I was making of argus well done she looks great looking forward to the "New" version
Thanks! It's a relief that especially you like it ;)

_________________
Work in progress:
DD County Class PNS Babur (1982)(PAK)
FF Type 21 Class D182 PNS Babur (2000)(PAK)
All relevant Coat of Arms


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
KimWerner
Post subject: Re: AO Class RFA Argus A135Posted: March 24th, 2011, 10:33 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2195
Joined: December 22nd, 2010, 12:13 pm
Location: Denmark
Well, I've decided to finish the new version of RFA Argus. I thought I was nearly finish but discovered a lot of details to change and submit compared to the old version. I'll guess she is only 85%-90% complete, but here she is:

_________________
Work in progress:
DD County Class PNS Babur (1982)(PAK)
FF Type 21 Class D182 PNS Babur (2000)(PAK)
All relevant Coat of Arms


Last edited by KimWerner on March 24th, 2011, 11:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Thiel
Post subject: Re: AO Class RFA Argus A135Posted: March 24th, 2011, 10:48 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 5376
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 3:02 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark
The lines on the underwater hull should be black and not the dark grey and purple shades you've used so far.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 4 of 9  [ 90 posts ]  Return to “Real Designs” | Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5 69 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: reytuerto, yurchenko and 18 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]