Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 4 of 5  [ 43 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5 »
Author Message
Portsmouth Bill
Post subject: Re: AO Fort (I) Class RFA Fort Austin A386Posted: April 22nd, 2011, 1:49 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 3220
Joined: August 16th, 2010, 7:45 am
Location: Cambridge United Kingdom
Well, This one will have to be decided by Gollevainen, (or a majority of Moderators?) as I have to confess that I have also sinned against the Standard on my current HMS Belfast, where I've emphasised exposed but covered areas in a darker shade, to indicate the shaded area; o.k. not to the extent that Kim uses here, but my humble opinion is that the various depths of the large superstructure here are enhanced by diferences in tone.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Gollevainen
Post subject: Re: AO Fort (I) Class RFA Fort Austin A386Posted: April 22nd, 2011, 2:07 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4714
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
Location: Finland
Contact: Website
making the different angle surfaces hiding out from the drawing can be made by using the different shades. But when using shade, use it in the range of the normal hull/upperworks shade. Sometimes a shade bit ligther than the upperworks standard shade can be added, but don't gimick around with too many shades. The shipbucke'ts idea is that the drawing is clearly colored in uniform color, and when the shade's and shaddow are used, there should be logic behind it.
Also when shading a curve use only one shading color Be it going ligther or darker is basicly up to everyone's taste (but again remember to retain the logic along the entire drawing), but do not use multible shades making stepped appereance.

Also, Don't try to justify a new non-kosher way of drawing by " but it looks better". Our drawings aren't supposed to look all the time better and better but to look like shipbucket drawings.

_________________
Shipbucket mainsite, aka "The Archive"
New AU project "Aravala"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
KimWerner
Post subject: Re: AO Fort (I) Class RFA Fort Austin A386Posted: April 22nd, 2011, 5:26 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2195
Joined: December 22nd, 2010, 12:13 pm
Location: Denmark
Gollevainen wrote:
making the different angle surfaces hiding out from the drawing can be made by using the different shades. But when using shade, use it in the range of the normal hull/upperworks shade. Sometimes a shade bit ligther than the upperworks standard shade can be added, but don't gimick around with too many shades. The shipbucke'ts idea is that the drawing is clearly colored in uniform color, and when the shade's and shaddow are used, there should be logic behind it.
Also when shading a curve use only one shading color Be it going ligther or darker is basicly up to everyone's taste (but again remember to retain the logic along the entire drawing), but do not use multible shades making stepped appereance.

Also, Don't try to justify a new non-kosher way of drawing by " but it looks better". Our drawings aren't supposed to look all the time better and better but to look like shipbucket drawings.
I'm a bit confused. I'll hope you, Golly, will help me out. I'll reckon it have something to do with perception. When I had read tutorials and discussions my perception for the right SB-way for naval ships is two different greys for hull and superstructure (that's all agreeing in) but then? As I understand it I'm allowed to do some shading to show depth, and I think you implicate that above. But how much is too much? I really want to do Fort Austin in the right way, but of course as good as possible. I'm really confused about the boundaries. I know I'm a bit provocative sometimes, but it's excactly to find out the limit when I'm confused. I hope it's obvious there have been some major progress towards SB-style from the first WIP of Fort Austin untill the current one. :roll:

_________________
Work in progress:
DD County Class PNS Babur (1982)(PAK)
FF Type 21 Class D182 PNS Babur (2000)(PAK)
All relevant Coat of Arms


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Gollevainen
Post subject: Re: AO Fort (I) Class RFA Fort Austin A386Posted: April 23rd, 2011, 8:27 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4714
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:10 am
Location: Finland
Contact: Website
Quote:
As I understand it I'm allowed to do some shading to show depth, and I think you implicate that above. But how much is too much? I really want to do Fort Austin in the right way, but of course as good as possible. I'm really confused about the boundaries. I know I'm a bit provocative sometimes, but it's excactly to find out the limit when I'm confused. I hope it's obvious there have been some major progress towards SB-style from the first WIP of Fort Austin untill the current one.
Well I think I told that the principle is to use the shades that are there allready. To shade the normal upper works grey, go to either one notch darker or ligther, but not beyond that. Don't use multible stepped sets of colors.

As for what is really "wrong" this time, It looks to me that the upper works and the actuall hull shade difference is bit too deep, which gives the impression of wildly and wrongly used colors.
Also, the funnel shading (expecially in the part where you go darker from the normal color), is excatly what I mean with using multible shades.

_________________
Shipbucket mainsite, aka "The Archive"
New AU project "Aravala"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Bombhead
Post subject: Re: AO Fort (I) Class RFA Fort Austin A386Posted: April 23rd, 2011, 9:59 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2299
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 7:41 pm
Hands up,the funnel shadeing was one of my failed experiments :roll:


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
KimWerner
Post subject: Re: AO Fort (I) Class RFA Fort Austin A386Posted: April 23rd, 2011, 10:04 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2195
Joined: December 22nd, 2010, 12:13 pm
Location: Denmark
Gollevainen wrote:
Well I think I told that the principle is to use the shades that are there allready. To shade the normal upper works grey, go to either one notch darker or ligther, but not beyond that. Don't use multible stepped sets of colors.

As for what is really "wrong" this time, It looks to me that the upper works and the actuall hull shade difference is bit too deep, which gives the impression of wildly and wrongly used colors.
Also, the funnel shading (expecially in the part where you go darker from the normal color), is excatly what I mean with using multible shades.
I'll reckon I'm pretty close now ;)
Bombhead wrote:
Hands up,the funnel shadeing was one of my failed experiments
Thanks :lol: I'd kept it because in my opinion it looks right (but I'm a lot wiser now :lol: :lol: :lol: )

[ img ]

_________________
Work in progress:
DD County Class PNS Babur (1982)(PAK)
FF Type 21 Class D182 PNS Babur (2000)(PAK)
All relevant Coat of Arms


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Atalaya
Post subject: Re: AO Fort (I) Class RFA Fort Austin A386Posted: April 23rd, 2011, 10:52 am
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 72
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 11:08 am
Location: La coruña, España
Exclent work, my new friend, I'll make a new version for my fleet (AE) Spanish Armada
:D :D :D :D

_________________
Por mar,y por España[ img ]
La torre de Hércules Patrimonio de la Humanidad

If you want contact with me,I'm in Facebook. Send me a private message.


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
KimWerner
Post subject: Re: AO Fort (I) Class RFA Fort Austin A386Posted: April 23rd, 2011, 12:13 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2195
Joined: December 22nd, 2010, 12:13 pm
Location: Denmark
Atalaya wrote:
Exclent work, my new friend, I'll make a new version for my fleet (AE) Spanish Armada
:D :D :D :D
;) Thanks! Happy to help to complete your fleet (armada!) :D

_________________
Work in progress:
DD County Class PNS Babur (1982)(PAK)
FF Type 21 Class D182 PNS Babur (2000)(PAK)
All relevant Coat of Arms


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Novice
Post subject: Re: AO Fort (I) Class RFA Fort Austin A386Posted: April 23rd, 2011, 3:45 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 4126
Joined: July 27th, 2010, 5:25 am
Location: Vrijstaat
Excellent, and to see it finally done is a true eye catcher. Top marks here.

_________________
[ img ] Thank you Kim for the crest

"Never fear to try on something new. Remember that the Titanic was built by professionals, and the Ark by an amateur"


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
KimWerner
Post subject: Re: AO Fort (I) Class RFA Fort Austin A386Posted: April 23rd, 2011, 4:04 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 2195
Joined: December 22nd, 2010, 12:13 pm
Location: Denmark
Novice wrote:
Excellent, and to see it finally done is a true eye catcher. Top marks here.
:D Thanks! I appreciate your kind words.

_________________
Work in progress:
DD County Class PNS Babur (1982)(PAK)
FF Type 21 Class D182 PNS Babur (2000)(PAK)
All relevant Coat of Arms


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 4 of 5  [ 43 posts ]  Return to “Real Designs” | Go to page « 1 2 3 4 5 »

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]