Shipbucket

There's something wonky going on with the cranes.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.

I like it.
Use some shades on the funnel though. It just looks to bulky.

_________________
- - -> My Worklist! <- - -

Very nice work!

That's because it is that bulky.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.

Shaft looks way to long, if the engineroom are located under the superstructure/funnel aft.

_________________
Morten812

Morten Jensen
Randers
Denmark

Traffic Manager

I have no idea how accurate it is, but the one drawing I found on the Historical RFA site show a much different hull.

_________________
“Close” only counts with horseshoes, hand grenades, and tactical nuclear weapons.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error

Worklist

Source Materiel is always welcome.

That is the same drawing I used as the basis I do now have a much more accurate photo, it is of Sir Tristram on a floating dry dock, but I would think the hull form is the same or similar for the class, I used a generic low profile and low draft hull on my original pick as I had no proper reference for below the water line. As I now do have a picture I will be reworking the hull, it was a trick one as these ships we designed to beach the draft had to be small yet allow the ships stability in heavy seas.

New low profile hull based on photograph of Sir Tristram in Dry Dock, still work to do but i think its getting there.
.

My bad....

_________________
- - -> My Worklist! <- - -