Youboat, no, your underwater hull is still not correct. The aft section doesn't feature the typical flutes along the upper edges of the propeller shaft line, beneath the CWL. Take a look, a closer look at Colo's magnificent Cleveland and you'll see what I'm referring too. Also the tail-end of the aft floatplane should angle sharply up, not that rounded edging you have. All fairly typical American design traits at the time, with regards to cruiser design - and this is a cruiser hull.
_________________ My Avatar:Петр Алексеевич Безобразов (Petr Alekseevich Bezobrazov), Вице-адмирал , царская ВМФ России(1845-1906) - I sign my drawings as Ari Saarinen
Bezo, the problem here is that he unfortunately worked from one of the earlier drawings of the Cleveland class which was floating around until Tim updated the US folder. The original Cleveland drawing had a hull that was regrettably traced from a blueprints.com drawing in 2008, hence the inaccuracies.
Colo, I understand that now. Makes it even stranger then that he's not using your terrific hull to get it right. You know I wholly approve your Cleveland, believing it to be the most accurate hence. Now, would Youboat be allowed to use that hull? That's your concern whether to agree to that or not. I hope, though, you'll give him a fair shot at it - if he chooses to take it!
_________________ My Avatar:Петр Алексеевич Безобразов (Petr Alekseevich Bezobrazov), Вице-адмирал , царская ВМФ России(1845-1906) - I sign my drawings as Ari Saarinen
It goes all the way down, to the bottom edge of the fins, I e, the stab. fins are actually placed (replaced) on the lower edge of the bulge. Is this helpful?
_________________ My Avatar:Петр Алексеевич Безобразов (Petr Alekseevich Bezobrazov), Вице-адмирал , царская ВМФ России(1845-1906) - I sign my drawings as Ari Saarinen