Shipbucket
http://67.205.157.234/forums/

Alaska class cruisers rework
http://67.205.157.234/forums/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=4200		 Page 16 of 17
Author:  ONI-Defense [ September 19th, 2014, 1:49 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Alaska class cruisers rework
Excellent work, Colo.

:| I don't see reposting reference images just because they were sent as a PM as an offense at all, so I don't get why CMike got all worked up about it.
Author:  ailgin [ September 19th, 2014, 2:17 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Alaska class cruisers rework
ONI-Defense wrote:
Excellent work, Colo.

:| I don't see reposting reference images just because they were sent as a PM as an offense at all, so I don't get why CMike got all worked up about it.
I think everyone else thinks the same thing. What's the reason to get so worked up? Who knows.
Author:  Colombamike [ September 19th, 2014, 7:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Alaska class cruisers rework
ailgin wrote:
ONI-Defense wrote:
:| I don't see reposting reference images just because they were sent as a PM as an offense at all, so I don't get why CMike got all worked up about it.
I think everyone else thinks the same thing. What's the reason to get so worked up? Who knows.
You destroy the "desire to help"
On the web, there are (morals) barriers, they must be respected
Author:  ONI-Defense [ September 19th, 2014, 8:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Alaska class cruisers rework
Those reference images can also help other members point out mistakes in a drawing, in turn helping the artist even more in creating an accurate depiction of the ship they are drawing. Hence why I see no issue in it in this case. They are public domain images after all.

EDIT: I don't want to derail this thread any further, so this is my last post on the matter.
Author:  ailgin [ September 19th, 2014, 8:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Alaska class cruisers rework
Colombamike wrote:
ailgin wrote:
ONI-Defense wrote:
:| I don't see reposting reference images just because they were sent as a PM as an offense at all, so I don't get why CMike got all worked up about it.
I think everyone else thinks the same thing. What's the reason to get so worked up? Who knows.
You destroy the "desire to help"
On the web, there are (morals) barriers, they must be respected
I destroy the desire to help? What really destroys the desire of other members to help is that you obviously didn't want anyone else to help Colo. As ONI-Defense said, other members could point out mistakes, allowing Colo to make a better drawing. And how is wondering why you got so pissed off "destroying the desire to help"? To Colo and/or Golly- I'm sorry to once again have an argument with Mike occur in this thread, but I don't understand how I broke "moral barriers" or "destroyed the desire to help."
Author:  Colosseum [ September 19th, 2014, 8:41 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Alaska class cruisers rework
Colombamike is upset because I reposted an image he had sent me as private message. I understand the desire for privacy, but again these are public domain images, and nothing personal/private was revealed.

Honestly the argument that developed here a few months ago soured my interest in drawing for quite a while, hence my recent silence on this board.
Author:  ailgin [ September 19th, 2014, 9:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Alaska class cruisers rework
Colosseum wrote:
Colombamike is upset because I reposted an image he had sent me as private message. I understand the desire for privacy, but again these are publicgonnan images, and nothing personal/private was revealed.

Honestly the argument that developed here a few months ago soured my interest in drawing for quite a while, hence my recent silence on this board.
I do understand this Colo, but I don't know why I'm being accused of destroying anything. But that's all I'm gonna say.
Author:  heuhen [ September 19th, 2014, 10:52 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Alaska class cruisers rework
ailgin wrote:
Colosseum wrote:
Colombamike is upset because I reposted an image he had sent me as private message. I understand the desire for privacy, but again these are publicgonnan images, and nothing personal/private was revealed.

Honestly the argument that developed here a few months ago soured my interest in drawing for quite a while, hence my recent silence on this board.
I do understand this Colo, but I don't know why I'm being accused of destroying anything. But that's all I'm gonna say.

you are not being accused for anything... if someone is accusing you for something, it might be that you asked about something old... "old wounds, heals better if left alone"
Author:  ailgin [ September 19th, 2014, 11:59 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Alaska class cruisers rework
heuhen wrote:
ailgin wrote:
Colosseum wrote:
Colombamike is upset because I reposted an image he had sent me as private message. I understand the desire for privacy, but again these are publicgonnan images, and nothing personal/private was revealed.

Honestly the argument that developed here a few months ago soured my interest in drawing for quite a while, hence my recent silence on this board.
I do understand this Colo, but I don't know why I'm being accused of destroying anything. But that's all I'm gonna say.

you are not being accused for anything... if someone is accusing you for something, it might be that you asked about something old... "old wounds, heals better if left alone"
I said the same thing as ONI-Defense. But as I said, I'm not saying anything more.
Author:  Tempest [ September 21st, 2014, 11:16 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Alaska class cruisers rework
Awesome drawing Colosseum
Page 16 of 17 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
https://www.phpbb.com/