As far as I can tell, since I'm not with my reference works, it looks good. I will have to check more closely tonight, though, for a more comprehensive critique (or praise!) - However, two things strike my attention immediately: why have you named it the "Aboukir'-class. It ought to be the "Cressy"-class. Also, the navigation bridge wings look way too "bland'. There's no sense or perception of their curvature or, for that matter, extension. The navigation lights are also missing at the aft tips of the wings. - Yes, already in 1901 they carried them. Another thing: according to the photographs, the bridge wings did not extend beyond the front face of the pilot house, which also had slightly slanted sides, which, on your drawing are not evident.
As a future project, I'm planning to draw the Diadem-class protected cruisers, of which the Cressys were the armored cruiser equivalents. Therefore I have studied both classes quite extensively.
I see what you mean about the bridge wings and I did think about that at the time.There was two ways of doing it, shade the curve in the canvas or guard rail it with deminishing spaces. I need to pick your brains on the funnel bandings too, not sure I have the right ship ?
And well spotted Charybdis.
Thanks DG but I didn't draw the badge I just lifted it from the web for Kim to work his magic on.