Moderator: Community Manager
[Post Reply] [*]  Page 2 of 2  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page « 1 2
Author Message
Colosseum
Post subject: Re: FREMM IT, GP Bergamini and ASW FasanPosted: May 25th, 2014, 8:09 pm
Offline
Posts: 5218
Joined: July 26th, 2010, 9:38 pm
Location: Austin, TX
Contact: Website
Great stuff. The hull shading looks excellent and the signal flags abeam the forward superstructure are a nice touch.

_________________
USN components, camouflage colors, & reference links (World War II only)


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: FREMM IT, GP Bergamini and ASW FasanPosted: May 25th, 2014, 8:20 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
I have doubts about the correctness of that hull shading though.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
MihoshiK
Post subject: Re: FREMM IT, GP Bergamini and ASW FasanPosted: May 25th, 2014, 8:21 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 1035
Joined: October 16th, 2010, 11:06 pm
Location: In orbit, watching you draw.
Contact: Website
It's... a year and a half old, actually. All I did was slap a new turret on it. Hope Little Bird sees it quickly.

_________________
Would you please not eat my gun...
[ img ]


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
sebu
Post subject: Re: FREMM IT, GP Bergamini and ASW FasanPosted: May 25th, 2014, 8:37 pm
Offline
Posts: 646
Joined: August 18th, 2010, 9:18 am
What's wrong in it? I think some of us gone too far with "excellency" if someone dare to say this is not good enough...


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: FREMM IT, GP Bergamini and ASW FasanPosted: May 25th, 2014, 8:42 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
sebu wrote:
What's wrong in it? I think some of us gone too far with "excellency" if someone dare to say this is not good enough...
it does not represent the shape of an ship correctly in the bow. did some research recently on what sb drawings actually show with the hull shading and if we compare it with the actual ships many drawings which recently have applied this shading are shaded wrong.

it is just the effort that shows distinction between good looking and correct.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
sebu
Post subject: Re: FREMM IT, GP Bergamini and ASW FasanPosted: May 25th, 2014, 9:05 pm
Offline
Posts: 646
Joined: August 18th, 2010, 9:18 am
acelanceloet wrote:
sebu wrote:
What's wrong in it? I think some of us gone too far with "excellency" if someone dare to say this is not good enough...
it does not represent the shape of an ship correctly in the bow. did some research recently on what sb drawings actually show with the hull shading and if we compare it with the actual ships many drawings which recently have applied this shading are shaded wrong.

it is just the effort that shows distinction between good looking and correct.
Well, maybe so but this drawing of Little Bird is the best so far of this particular vessel in SB. So, if you gonna want it to be better I'd suggest you'll do it better; no offence, as always...


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
acelanceloet
Post subject: Re: FREMM IT, GP Bergamini and ASW FasanPosted: May 25th, 2014, 9:28 pm
Offline
User avatar
Posts: 7510
Joined: July 28th, 2010, 12:25 pm
Location: the netherlands
sebu wrote:
acelanceloet wrote:
sebu wrote:
What's wrong in it? I think some of us gone too far with "excellency" if someone dare to say this is not good enough...
it does not represent the shape of an ship correctly in the bow. did some research recently on what sb drawings actually show with the hull shading and if we compare it with the actual ships many drawings which recently have applied this shading are shaded wrong.

it is just the effort that shows distinction between good looking and correct.
Well, maybe so but this drawing of Little Bird is the best so far of this particular vessel in SB. So, if you gonna want it to be better I'd suggest you'll do it better; no offence, as always...
no offence taken.
what I mean to say is that I would like to ask little bird, to change one little thing which makes it more correct. I have no intention on doing his work, or redrawing his ship. the fix is actually quite a bit smaller then the addition of the new gun mihoshik just did.

_________________
Drawings are credited with J.Scholtens
I ask of you to prove me wrong. Not say I am wrong, but prove it, because then I will have learned something new.
Shipbucket Wiki admin


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Philbob
Post subject: Re: FREMM IT, GP Bergamini and ASW FasanPosted: May 26th, 2014, 2:04 am
Offline
Posts: 586
Joined: July 30th, 2010, 3:45 am
THis probably belongs in the "never built" section but two further FREMM multipurpose frigates (the ninth and tenth), with integrated mast, AESA 4 fixed flats radar, ABM/AAW capability, 20 kts cruise speed (diesels only): to contract within spring 2015... I hear Selix is the going to develope the Radars.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italian_Na ... alian_Navy

_________________
Supreme Commander of the Astrofleets


Top
[Profile] [Quote]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
[Post Reply]  Page 2 of 2  [ 18 posts ]  Return to “Real Designs” | Go to page « 1 2

Jump to: 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 61 guests


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]