Search found 54 matches

[ Search found 54 matches ]  Go to page 1 2 3 4 5 6 »
Author Message

 Forum: Parts Sheets Discussion  Topic: Soviet/Russian Naval Surface-to-Air Missiles (Rebuild)

 Post subject: Re: Soviet/Russian Naval Surface-to-Air Missiles (Rebuild) Posted: December 31st, 2015, 1:32 am 

Replies: 13
Views: 33304


Oh my!

 Forum: Parts Sheets Discussion  Topic: How to draw a cage mast tutorial

 Post subject: Re: How to draw a cage mast tutorial Posted: July 8th, 2014, 12:30 pm 

Replies: 14
Views: 20039


Whoa. Brilliant is brilliant.

 Forum: Parts Sheets Discussion  Topic: Planebucket Discussion Thread

 Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread Posted: March 16th, 2014, 4:55 pm 

Replies: 1225
Views: 1250019


Now I know what you're thinking now, your crew will just operate with oxygen masks then. It's really a temporary fix and even then, a rather ugly fix. Oxygen masks tend to limit crew movement and be imperfect (particularly in sealing), which is why the B-29 was such a big deal in that it had pressu...

 Forum: General Discussion  Topic: Skijump CATOBAR

 Post subject: Re: Skijump CATOBAR Posted: March 16th, 2014, 3:43 pm 

Replies: 8
Views: 7175


Good points gentlemen. Very enlighting experience.

 Forum: General Discussion  Topic: Skijump CATOBAR

 Post subject: Re: Skijump CATOBAR Posted: March 16th, 2014, 6:27 am 

Replies: 8
Views: 7175


Skijump brings safety in take off as aircraft is send out high in sky and that gives pilot vital seconds to eject if things go wrong and power is lost. Catobar enables much higher take off weights but has much less error marginal for pilot right after launch. If catapult is a straight one currently ...

 Forum: General Discussion  Topic: Skijump CATOBAR

 Post subject: Skijump CATOBAR Posted: March 16th, 2014, 12:52 am 

Replies: 8
Views: 7175


Just thought about it. Launching Cat aircraft like Hornet or Rafale from bow catapult at skijump. Would have benefits from both systems but might cause excessive stress on airframe? Why don't we have this already?

 Forum: Parts Sheets Discussion  Topic: Planebucket Discussion Thread

 Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread Posted: March 15th, 2014, 11:54 pm 

Replies: 1225
Views: 1250019


Why pressure? We're not building comfortable airliner here.

 Forum: Parts Sheets Discussion  Topic: Planebucket Discussion Thread

 Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread Posted: March 15th, 2014, 8:00 pm 

Replies: 1225
Views: 1250019


Ok, but the R-15 is designed for a very specific flight envelope. Any nation will stockpile large amounts of whatever engines all its planes use. That is a good point. I need to come up with an excuse to have them or alter backstory. Probably both. That is exactly how not to design an aircraft's in...

 Forum: Parts Sheets Discussion  Topic: Planebucket Discussion Thread

 Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread Posted: March 15th, 2014, 3:04 pm 

Replies: 1225
Views: 1250019


I don't know how wood or steel are supposed to be incorporated exactly...both are far, far from ideal for a plane of this size and complexity. The DH Mosquito really represents the max performance you're going to get out of an all-wood construction. What worked for it isn't going to work with a lar...

 Forum: Parts Sheets Discussion  Topic: Planebucket Discussion Thread

 Post subject: Re: Planebucket Discussion Thread Posted: March 13th, 2014, 2:39 pm 

Replies: 1225
Views: 1250019


https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/228582057/Shipbucket/high%20speed%20bomber.PNG AV-122 Dragon is a heavy bomber built mostly from scraps of MiG 25 fleet in 70's to counter threat by fascistic Rameniak. Built largely from steel and wood as aluminum was difficult to get through naval blockade. Ste...
Display: Sort by: Direction:
Go to advanced search [ Search found 54 matches ]  Go to page 1 2 3 4 5 6 »


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Jump to: 

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]