Search found 255 matches
[ Search found 255 matches ]  Go to page 1 2 3 4 5 … 26 »
Author Message

 Forum: Non-Shipbucket Drawings  Topic: Arleigh Burke Flight III - 3D concept

Lebroba
 Post subject: Re: Arleigh Burke Flight III - 3D concept Posted: February 18th, 2018, 2:48 pm 

Replies: 61
Views: 3143596


Some cool work, I like the level of detail.

 Forum: Off Topic  Topic: USS Fitzgerald collision.

Lebroba
 Post subject: Re: USS Fitzgerald collision. Posted: June 18th, 2017, 2:17 pm 

Replies: 18
Views: 40662


Fitzgerald is the last ship I served on. I departed mid 2016. I'm currently a Senior Chief stationed at the Center for Surface Combat Systems in Dahlgren,VA. Out of respect for the family and crew, I would ask that you keep the speculation to a minimum. The bodies of those who perished were recovere...

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: More ASW focused Eendracht Class

Lebroba
 Post subject: Re: More ASW focused Eendracht Class Posted: September 14th, 2016, 2:29 pm 

Replies: 19
Views: 17154


Sonar is still not the primary detection method for submarines. I think that being able to "see" a threat further than you can engage it with your weapon is still advantageous. If you break it down to a time distance problem, if you can detect the submarine further, it changes the scheme of maneuver...

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: More ASW focused Eendracht Class

Lebroba
 Post subject: Re: More ASW focused Eendracht Class Posted: September 12th, 2016, 5:44 pm 

Replies: 19
Views: 17154


Thanks for sharing that guys. I did some reading on the SQG-1 and QGBa sonars. They were pretty terrible, which I think the Navy realized, prompting the switch to SQS-23. Unless there was some reason that you absolutely have to stick to that configuration, I would recommend bypassing the double conf...

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: More ASW focused Eendracht Class

Lebroba
 Post subject: Re: More ASW focused Eendracht Class Posted: September 11th, 2016, 11:25 pm 

Replies: 19
Views: 17154


The fact is that the search sonar in the 'destroyer' dome would be purely there for redundancy, I think. They would not be on at the same time, so these issues would not be there. Keep in mind, I will most likely know less about the sonars of that time period then you and other people here, but fac...

 Forum: Sources and Reference Drawings  Topic: Blueprints on DDG-97

Lebroba
 Post subject: Re: Blueprints on DDG-97 Posted: September 7th, 2016, 5:21 pm 

Replies: 2
Views: 6288


https://www.the-blueprints.com/blueprin ... 92_momsen/

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: More ASW focused Eendracht Class

Lebroba
 Post subject: Re: More ASW focused Eendracht Class Posted: August 28th, 2016, 5:08 pm 

Replies: 19
Views: 17154


I've never seen that kind of setup. Some of the concerns I have with the ASW setup: 1) You would have to be able to electronically sync the transmit/receive gates so you aren't pinging into the other set of hydrophones while they are in listen. a) This would be problematic if you are in different ra...

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: FFN(X)

Lebroba
 Post subject: Re: FFN(X) Posted: August 28th, 2016, 11:51 am 

Replies: 29
Views: 28627


Im a big fan of "outside the box" ideas, but there is no way you get an SQS-60 in there. I think you would need a COTS build similar to SQQ-89A (V)15 but with a SQS-56 transducer set

 Forum: Personal Designs  Topic: More ASW focused Eendracht Class

Lebroba
 Post subject: Re: More ASW focused Eendracht Class Posted: August 28th, 2016, 11:46 am 

Replies: 19
Views: 17154


What benefit would multiple active sonars provide?

 Forum: Non-Shipbucket Drawings  Topic: Destroyer (3D) WiP

Lebroba
 Post subject: Re: Destroyer (3D) WiP Posted: April 18th, 2016, 11:06 pm 

Replies: 8
Views: 9779


Compromise? I do like that Nansen class though.
[ img ]
Display: Sort by: Direction:
Go to advanced search [ Search found 255 matches ]  Go to page 1 2 3 4 5 … 26 »


The team | Delete all board cookies | All times are UTC


Jump to: 

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
[ GZIP: Off ]